วันจันทร์ที่ 16 มีนาคม พ.ศ. 2552

Iraq For Sale: The War Profiteers

Iraq for Sale: The War Profiteers

Description


Iraq for Sale: The War Profiteers is the story of what happens to everyday Americans when corporations go to war.

Acclaimed director Robert Greenwald (Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price, Outfoxed, and Uncovered) takes you inside the lives of soldiers, truck drivers, widows and children who have been changed forever as a result of profiteering in the reconstruction of Iraq. Iraq for Sale uncovers the connections between private corporations making a killing in Iraq and the decision makers who allow them to do so.
Rate Points :4.5
Binding :DVD
Label :Brave New Films
Manufacturer :Brave New Films
ProductGroup :DVD
Studio :Brave New Films
Publisher :Brave New Films
UPC :893890001994
EAN :0893890001994
Price :$14.95USD
Lowest Price :$10.71USD
Customer ReviewsEmotion reigns in this ranting film
Rating Point :2 Helpful Point :0
I am in the US Army.
This is not a documentary. It is made up of interspersed interviews with people who fit into four categories: families of civilian contractors who died, civilian contractors who survived an attack, eyewitnesses of wasteful spending by companies with government contracts, and former Soldiers of unknown character complaining about the use of civilian contractors in Iraq. Wrongdoing should be punished. This film never clears up whether it is against wasteful spending or against the use of civilian contractors altogether. The films arguments are too broad and, sometimes, random and confusing. Several times, the statement is made that "this war has been privatized to a greater extent than any other war in history." This is an asinine comment. With a new type of war being fought over the course of almost a decade, now, of course private companies will be employed more than before. Statements like these are devoid of value in the greater debate of how to regulate wasteful spending by these large corporations. Another frustrating element of this film is that the images from Iraq are not related to the story being told at that time. Its confusing for the viewer. Interviews with people who had first-hand knowledge of the wasteful spending were effective, but few, and as a result, the filmmaker spread them throughout the film, which watered down the effectiveness of their accounts. Unfortunate.
As a Soldier, I found the complaints about contractors living in better quarters than tent-bound Soldiers ridiculous. Soldiers, Marines, Sailors, and Airmen have given their lives to their Country and are willing to sleep in muck and grime for the sake of the cause. Civilians, brave and heroic them all, need a softer touch. The men and women of the U.S. Military are happy to sleep wherever the mission takes us. Keep your pity to yourself. Of course Soldiers are going to living in the suck, suffer, bleed, and die thats our calling. We love it! Were here, on the wall, so you dont have to be. Just say thank you and move on.
The emotional outcry against Halliburton as a demonic overlord is very compelling however, not backed by enough evidence to be completely persuasive. The speakers are mostly just making accusations that sound reasonable, but are not substantiated within the film itself. (This only makes the fact that there is a special feature on the DVD aimed at organizing protesters more laughable. Is it possible to organize protesters based solely on unsubstantiated claims, reasonable or not?) Someone is going to make money on the privatization of jobs by the U.S. Government. The American economy is built on the concept of companies doing what they can, within ethical boundaries, to make money. That shouldnt be discouraged. Only wrongful profiteering should be punished. This film does not clearly delineate between the two, so the viewer is never sure which is under attack.
There are two redeeming qualities in the film: First, the opening story of the Blackwater employee, who died in an ambush, was touching. The familys argument that an ambush, by definition a surprise attack, could have been avoided was heart-wrenchingly nave. The second redeeming comment was the argument that more Iraqi civilians should have been hired, thereby getting them off the street and winning a PR battle, was very enlightening. (This approach worked in Germany and Korea.) Too bad the rest of the film is simply an emotional debate and not one backed up by actual evidence, but rather logical assumptions on the part of the individual interviewees. Pass this one up.

Sad!!!
Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :0
We are too lazy, naive, afraid and stupefied to even comprehend what is happening around the globe. If it doesnt affect us directly its not our problem!! Right? Right!! Anyway people get too stressed when they see and or hear about extremely disturbing things, such as this DVDs context -Economical Racketeering By Big Business!!

Quick Summary:

Impartial governments around the globe look the other way while companies run amuck making ungodly profits from Tax-Payers. Did I mention all whom are ironically friends of government(s) and or were once government officials themselves?

The list of neglect (cutting corners over charging) for the almighty dollar are endless atrocities that are absolutely prevalent simply go unchecked.

Worry about that? Not Me Joe FreeWorld we/I cant change anything anyway ...were helpless!!!

Sadly, all of the people/families interviewed in this DVD were uneducated or unaware themselves UNTIL family members ended up dead or they themselves saw BIG BUSINESS up-close and personal.

These factions run along side our governments (some never even bid for the job its simply given to them) - all involved willing to put you in harms way for "PROFITABILITY"!!!

These companies spoke about in this program will never be held accountable for their over spending and or the death-toll to regular Joes ...not until its too late then maybe a few patsys will be thrown in jail.

This is the Zeitgeist of our times ...this is our legacy!!!
Crime pays
Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :0
As people looted in the streets of Iraq following the 2003 United States invasion, U.S. Secretary of War Donald Rumsfeld said, "Freedoms untidy, and free people are free to make mistakes and commit crimes and do bad things."

Perhaps the free-for-all Rumsfeld referenced wasnt Iraq citizens stealing television sets from bombed-out retail stores. As the documentary IRAQ FOR SALE details, those feeling free to commit crimes and do bad things in U.S.-occupied Iraq are Halliburton, Titan, Blackwater and other contractors with friends in high places, namely the halls of the George W. Bush White House.

Privately-contracted interrogators abuse Iraqi citizens without being subject to laws that would call for a court martial were they U.S. military personnel. Kellogg Brown & Root supplies contaminated water to American soldiers. Halliburton charges $45 for a six-pack of soda pop. In IRAQ FOR SALE we see the contractors disregard for anything except profits includes the lives of their own employees, most noteworthy the four Blackwater security personnel who die because the company sends them ill-equipped and under-manned on a dangerous mission.

IRAQ FOR SALE presents a press conference clip where George W. Bush laughs off a reporters question about military contractor corruption. Rather than follow up with Bush, the reporter laughs, too, and lets him off the hook. Of all the accomplices Bush had in his illegal invasion of Iraq, the corporate media are among those with the dirtiest hands.

See IRAQ FOR SALE.
A Must See
Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :0
This is a must see. Our government contracts out the interrogation and torture of Iraqi civilians to private companies which are not subjected to any sort of supervision, so that the U.S. government can wash itself clean of any ethical misconduct.

This movie also addresses the tremendous financial gains that are made by several private companies that are essentially stealing money from taxpayers and care nothing for the health and well being of the militia they are contracted to protect.
fabulous Iraqi facts
Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :0
Iraq for Sale: The War ProfiteersThis film is amazing! I had a slap in the face wake up call. I know that I must work even harder to help stop what is happening in Iraq and stop the hemorrhaging of our military budjet and our American way of life from being funneled to the "WAR PROFITIEERS". Brilliant and concise detail. Our soliders deserve better. Diana Harden...Livermore, Ca.
Similar Item
  • Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price
  • DescriptionEveryone has seen Wal-Marts lavish television commercials, but have you ever wondered why Wal-Mart spends so much money trying to convince you it cares about your family, your community, and even its own employees? What is it hiding? WAL-
  • Who Killed the Electric Car?
  • In 1996, electric cars began to appear on roads all over California. They were quiet and fast, produced no exhaust and ran without gasoline. Ten years later, these futuristic cars were almost entirely gone. What happened? Why should we be haunted by
  • No End in Sight
  • Studio Magnolia Pict Hm Ent Release Date 11/25/2008 Run time 102 minutes Rating NrAmazon.comA staggering portrait of arrogance and incompetence, the documentary No End in Sight avoids the question of why the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003, choosing i
  • Sicko (Special Edition)
  • DescriptionFollowing on the heels of his Palm dOr winning Fahrenheit 9/11 and his Oscar winning film Bowling for Columbine, acclaimed filmmaker Michael Moores new documentary sets out to investigate the American healthcare system. Sticking to his tri
  • Why We Fight
  • DescriptionWhy We Fight is the provocative new documentary from acclaimed filmmaker Eugene Jarecki (The Trials of Henry Kissinger) and winner of the Grand Jury Prize at the 2005 Sundance Film Festival. Named after the series of short films by legend

    วันอาทิตย์ที่ 15 มีนาคม พ.ศ. 2552

    Antoine De La Mothe Cadillac: French Settlements At Detroit And Louisiana (In The Footsteps Of Explorers)

    Antoine De La Mothe Cadillac: French Settlements at Detroit And Louisiana (In the Footsteps of Explorers)

    Product Description


    Ages 9 to 12 years. This book outlines Antoine de la Mothe Cadillacs hunger for power and adventure led him to the New World where he founded Detroit, now one of the oldest cities in North America. Features include maps, his family history, and the legacy he left behind.
    Binding :Library Binding
    Label :Crabtree Publishing Company
    Manufacturer :Crabtree Publishing Company
    ProductGroup :Book
    Studio :Crabtree Publishing Company
    Publisher :Crabtree Publishing Company
    EAN :9780778724292
    Price :$26.60USD
    Lowest Price :$15.97USD

    วันเสาร์ที่ 14 มีนาคม พ.ศ. 2552

    วันศุกร์ที่ 13 มีนาคม พ.ศ. 2552

    Zigzag Journeys In Acadia And New France: The Historic Fields Of The Early French Settlements Of America

    Zigzag Journeys in Acadia and New France: The Historic Fields of the Early French Settlements of America

    Product Description


    1885. Zigzag Journeys in Acadia and New France A Summers Journey of the Zigzag Club Through the Historic Fields of the Early French Settlements of America. From the Preface: The aim of the Zigzag books is to awaken an interest in the history, geography, and political condition of each country of which they treat, by means of a narrative of supposed travel, that makes a visit to interesting places the purpose of the young travelers. It is hoped that the light narrative, with its pictures, legends, and interpolated stories, may awaken an interest in the young mind that will lead to the reading of more solid books on the same countries and topics, as maturer years follow the story-loving period of youth. Contents: A Zigzag Journey in New France (Canada) A Proposed Journey in Search of the Stories and Legends of New France The Zigzag Clubs Songs and Stories Cardinal Richelieus Dream of New France Charlie Nobles Concert For St. John Annapolis (Port Royal) To the Land of Evangeline Halifax and Louisburg Tales of the St. Lawrence Quebec Montreal and Toronto. See other titles by this author available from Kessinger Publishing.
    Binding :Paperback
    Label :Kessinger Publishing, LLC
    Manufacturer :Kessinger Publishing, LLC
    ProductGroup :Book
    Studio :Kessinger Publishing, LLC
    Publisher :Kessinger Publishing, LLC
    EAN :9781417903320
    Price :$30.95USD
    Lowest Price :$20.42USD

    วันพฤหัสบดีที่ 12 มีนาคม พ.ศ. 2552

    Color Of Olives, The

    Color of Olives, The

    Product Description


    From Mexican director Carolina Rivas and cinematographer Daoud Sarhandi comes this elegant and visually breathtaking new film about the Palestinian experience. The Amer family lives surrounded by the infamous West Bank Wall, where their daily lives are dominated by electrified fences, locked gates and a constant swarm of armed soldiers. This unique and intimate documentary shares their private world, allowing a glimpse of the constant struggles and the small, endearing details that sustain them. The Color of Olives is an artistic and beautifully affecting reflection on the effects of racial segregation, the meaning of borders and the absurdity of war.
    Rate Points :5.0
    Binding :DVD
    Label :afd
    Manufacturer :afd
    ProductGroup :DVD
    Studio :afd
    Publisher :afd
    UPC :643519118998
    EAN :0643519118998
    Price :$24.99USD
    Lowest Price :$19.98USD
    Customer Reviews
    Similar Item
  • Encounter Point
  • Just when the world is losing hope about the possibility of resolving the Palestinian-Israeli conflict comes ENCOUNTER POINT. Created by a Palestinian, Israeli, North and South American team, ENCOUNTER POINT moves beyond sensational and dogmatic imag
  • Until When...
  • Paradise Now
  • Amazon.comTwo men, best friends from childhood, are summoned to fulfill their agreement to be suicide bombers for the Palestinian cause. Khaled and Said (Ali Suliman and Kais Nashef, both making striking film debuts) believe fervently in their cause,
  • Private
  • DescriptionWinner!! - Best Film, 2004 Locarno Film Festival Winner!! - Best Actor, Mohammad Bakri, 2004 Locarno Film Festival Winner!! - Fipresci Jury Award, 2005 Intl. Federation of Film Critics Mohammad (Mohammad Bakri), his wife (Areen Omari) and
  • Promises
  • Amazon.comPromises presents a powerful portrait of seven Palestinian and Israeli children who live in and around Jerusalem. As filmmaker B.Z. Goldberg, who was raised in Israel, notes, "They live no more than 20 minutes from each other, but they are

    วันพุธที่ 11 มีนาคม พ.ศ. 2552

    Private

    Private

    Description


    Winner!! - Best Film, 2004 Locarno Film Festival
    Winner!! - Best Actor, Mohammad Bakri, 2004 Locarno Film Festival
    Winner!! - Fipresci Jury Award, 2005 Intl. Federation of Film Critics

    Mohammad (Mohammad Bakri), his wife (Areen Omari) and their five children live in a large, isolated house located mid-way between a Palestinian village and an Israeli settlement. Viewed as a strategic lookout point, the house is forcefully taken over by Israeli soldiers, who confine Mohammad and his family to a few downstairs rooms in daytime and a single room at night. Against his wifes wishes, Mohammad decides to keep the family together in the house until the soldiers move on, creating division among his kin and a precarious relationship with the soldiers. Italys pick for the 2005 Foreign Film Oscar competition (before being disqualified by the Academy because the primary languages were not Itlaian), Saverio Costanzos first feature is a powerful and haunting psychological thriller.

    DVD EXTRAS:
  • Directors Bio
  • Production Information
  • Trailers

  • Rate Points :3.5
    Binding :DVD
    Label :Typecast Releasing
    Manufacturer :Typecast Releasing
    ProductGroup :DVD
    Studio :Typecast Releasing
    Publisher :Typecast Releasing
    UPC :643519120595
    EAN :0643519117397
    Price :$29.99USD
    Lowest Price :$14.00USD
    Customer ReviewsBrutal, honest, sincere
    Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :14
    Easily the best film I have seen on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Private expresses the intense antagonisms of the political conflict through an extremely particular interaction between a Palestinian family and an Israeli military unit. Though the political and the personal are woven into each and every struggle of the film, characters are accorded their humanity in personal terms, avoiding the common descent into generalization of many films on this conflict.

    The greatest strength of this film is that, though the conflict is central to every piece of the story, it is expressed primarily in its pervasive influence on the individual: the brutality of power, racism, the struggle to maintain purpose amidst uncertainty and fear. In doing this, the film refuses to draw clear lines. There are few heroes, and their moments of redemeption are not grand but small, reluctant, even accidental.

    This film has not received the publicity of other recent films and documentaries on the conflict. I fear this is partly because it does not provide that warm, fuzzy feeling U.S. audiences seek. But, probably more important, the film is geared for an audience that is already familiar with the conflict. There is little explanation of who the characters are or the circumstances in which the plot occurs. These are immediately obvious to those familiar with the conflict, but may lead to confusion on the part of many viewers.

    Still, if it is a window into the intimate struggles of the conflict you seek, I can not recommend any better film. While one can not help but draw broader implications, it is very clear that the characters are not meant to be merely lowest-common-denominator representatives of their respective societies. Each tells their own tale, and the parts do not add up to the whole story of the conflict, but the pieces that are presented are thoroughly and sincerely told.
    Intense and Difficult
    Rating Point :3 Helpful Point :4
    Not many American audiences will be familiar with Saverio Costanzos Golden Leopard Award winning Private. This is because Hollywood would not dare to approach the Palestine-Israeli issue from a decidely Arab prospective. The second reason is that this is intense filmmaking that challenges our ideas on the Middle Eastern situation.

    Mohammad(Mohammad Bakri) is a middle aged father of five living with his wife Samiah (Areen Omari) in a lage house midway between a Palestinian village and an Israeli settlement. Sice the home can be viewed as a strategic lookout point it is forceably occupied by Israeli soldiers led by Commander Ofer (Lior Miller). The family is given the choice either to leave the house or to occupy a few downstairs rooms in the daytime and be locked in the living room at night. The family, under pain of punishment, is told that they must not venture into the upstairs bedrooms where the soldiers are staying.

    What follows the occupation can be seen as a metaphor for the entire Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Mohammad is faced with the choice to leave and thus give up his principles to to maintain his nonviolent protest come what may. His oldest daughter,Mariam (Hend Ayoub), wants to stay and fight but at great danger to herself tries desperately to humanize her captors. The familys oldeat son, Jamal (Marco Alsaving)chooses a far more violent approach. He sides with Palestinian freedom fighters and imagines himself to be one. What we have here is more than the story of a people. Rather it is the very real story of a family falling apart in the face of adversity.

    The film was shot in DV by Luigi Martinucci and the picture has a murky verite feel especially in the nighttime scenes. The viewer becomes almost a voyeur to the action and as the movie moves along we feel claustrophobic and trapped like the family.

    This is a difficult film to watch because of the subject matter but it should be seen by a wider audience than it has. The all region disc by Typecast features none of the special features that are available on the Region 2 disc that has been widely reviewed in the media. The Dolby 2.0 sountrack is servicable and the disc contains a trailer and simple production notes.

    Well worth the effort if you can find it.
    Liberal Sentimental Mush
    Rating Point :1 Helpful Point :7
    What would one say about a film portraying a concentration camp during the holocaust where the key questions are those posed to the inmates how are they going to resist, will they collaborate, and so on. What if the SS guard in the watchtower during the day is portrayed as "human", and playing around with his mates after work? And a film where no hard questions are put to the _oppressor_. Well, Costanzos film is just that in the Palestinian context. It is film that delves primarily on trite clichs, sentimental mush about the victims, and also about portraying the soldiers as "human" and also victims.

    The film was shot in Italy with a cast of Palestinian and Israeli actors. All the Israelis are active members of the Israeli armed forces, and the lead Israeli character is a member of the infamous Golani brigade -- known for its violent actions in the occupied territories. During the initial stages of the filming, a competition arose between the Palestinians and Israelis to outbid one another in portraying their "humanity". Of course, following this formula it is not possible to depict the Palestinian condition, and the portrayal of Israeli actions is inherently biased -- the soldiers are on their best behavior, and dont show the brutal face seen by most Palestinians.

    The film finds the silliest means imaginable to show the Israeli "human face". The teenage daughter seeks to steal a weapon and possibly use it against the soldiers, but is thwarted at the last moment by an intervention of another soldier. She manages to hide in a closet and gets a glimpse of her tormentors. After this close brush, she repeatedly hides in the closet to get further insights into the soldiers lives, and determines that there is a "human side" to them -- humanity viewed through a peephole. From this insight, she also changes her attitude towards the occupier and adopts her fathers steadfast resistance. Costanzo uses the glimpses of "humanity" seen covertly through the closets doors to demonstrate that the Israeli soldiers are "human". This framework is patently absurd because the issue is not the warm relationship among the soldiers or the fact that they get excited about football the issue is their behavior towards the Palestinians and here there isnt much "humane" behavior in evidence. Similarly, the many actual cases of dispossession are not marked by "humane" behavior in reality, brutality is the norm. The transformation of the daughters assessment of the soldiers doesnt come about because of a change in their behavior towards the family, but only because she finds that between each other the soldiers are actually quite ordinary! Nothing in the reaction of the Israeli soldiers could explain the change of the two teenage children from willingness to countenance violence to one where they decide to pursue a non-violent steadfast resistance.

    One must also wonder why the director seeks to "humanize" the oppressor. It would be difficult to imagine the need to "humanize", say, the armed settlers who make Palestinian lives miserable. Those perpetrating brutal and sordid acts dont deserve to be "humanized" -- what is important is to highlight the oppression, not the nature of the oppressors.
    Neither does the father have much to show for his steadfastness. His small acts of resistance bear no fruit, nor do they change the Israeli behavior. On the contrary, for the flimsiest of reasons the Israeli commander threatens to execute him in front of his family -- oh yes, one of the soldiers briefly raises an objection that is quickly dismissed by the officer. There is no reason in this film to think that the Israelis have changed their attitude, let alone decide to exit the house and observe common decency.

    Some days after the threatened execution, Bakri and the officer sit at the kitchen table, and maybe this was meant to show a glimpse of mutual appreciation. The officer asks Bakri why he stays in his house -- which yields the profound reply "because this is my house"! The fact that the Israeli soldier asks the question at all is already problematic because in reality it is a common question asked by soldiers of those whom they seek to dispossess. The dialogue with this soldier isnt one where the oppressor tries to understand the oppressed. Bakris means of resistance hasnt penetrated through to the human core of his tormentors.

    The portrayal of the steadfast resistance, or sumud, is also flawed. In one scene, the youngest daughter desperately seeks to go to the bathroom and acceding to her plight would mean her father banging on the door, demanding that the soldiers allow his daughter to go to the bathroom. Instead of banging on the door and eliciting a likely confrontation, Bakri urges his daughter to resist her need to go! NB: steadfast non-violent resistance doesnt mean that one should improve ones bladder control. Non-violent resistance is more than just clinging on to a patch of land in Gandhis approach, it entails confronting the oppressor. In this film, non-violent resistance is represented as clinging on to the house, and the father seeks to keep confrontations with the soldiers to a minimum. Again, this is absurd.

    Missing the key point

    The film dwells on the intra-family tensions in dealing with the occupation of their house and focuses on the friction arising from the characters differing views on how to confront the soldiers. The films focus is how to resist, with a strong suggestion that the resistance should be non-violent. However, the director fails to ask the key question and never really explains _why_ the soldiers invaded this house or why there are any tensions between Israelis and Palestinians. The means whereby Palestinians resist is an issue that has to be debated in their society and by the people affected by the occupation and dispossession. Whatever the outcome of that debate, i.e., a non-violent or violent way to resist, should not affect an outsiders solidarity with a people who have been subjected to mass injustice. Now, if one were to query why this dreadful situation persists, then this would raise questions for the oppressor and those outside the region concerned with the injustices being perpetrated. Unfortunately, the film stresses the issues centering on the Palestinian society, and not those that impinge on Israelis or outsiders. In essence, the film fails on many levels.

    Illegitimate questions

    Many soldiers and settlers in the occupied territories are making the life of the Palestinians miserable, and the questions that come to mind are those one would want to pose to the soldiers -- the oppressors. How do they justify the manifest barbarity against the Palestinians? When they invade houses, why do they opt for this drawn out torture and misery? Why do they feel that they are justified in stealing Palestinian homes? And why does the Israeli government connive with the settlers? These are the key questions. Ultimately, these questions need to be addressed by anyone concerned with confronting injustice.


    It would have been rather tactless for anyone to have asked the Palestinian family portrayed in the film how they planned to resist the soldiers attempt to steal their home. If they chose to resist by violent means this would have given the Israelis the ultimate pretext to dispossess and banish the family. If they chose steadfast resistance, they would have to endure the brutality, humiliation and intimidation. It is facile for liberals to pontificate about non-violent resistance, but ultimately any option has stark consequences. It is also a sign of illegitimate solidarity for one to put the onus on the Palestinians and the way they confront the armed settlers or the soldiers. The key moral questions need to be posed to the oppressors, not the oppressed. Alas, this film deals exclusively with questions posed to the oppressed, and this comes after decades of oppression and dispossession.
    Compelling
    Rating Point :4 Helpful Point :1
    This film shows an unusual "other side" of the Middle East problem. The media is kind of controlled and we never get to see the palestinian casualties and drama. Some unaware people even think they dont have hearts,families, children and pain. The film also suggests that when you live a desperate life and have no choices sometimes you look for desperate actions.
    Increasing Understanding
    Rating Point :4 Helpful Point :1
    "Private"

    Increasing Understanding

    Amos Lassen

    Understanding the Israeli/Palestinian conflict is not easy even for those of us that once lived there. "Private", an Italian film, looks at the conflict and tries to make it more understandable. "Private" shows the horror and pain that a Palestinian family goes through. Under occupation one loses his freedom.
    The plot is simple--a Palestinian family with five children lives near Israeli settlements. The wife, Samia, wants to leave as does one of her teen sons. However, Mohammed, the father/husband, not only does not want to go and is adamant about staying. Two of the children want to fight but Mohammed favors passive aggression as a non-violent witness. Suddenly Israeli soldiers burst into their home and take over the second floor. The family is locked in the living room at night allowing them almost no mobility. We see how the occupation affects the children and their parents marriage. It is through daughter, Miriam that we see the Israeli forces and how they behave. The eldest son, Jamal, is so angered that he sets a trap with a grenade. Realizing that chaos and death are not far away, the family calls to Allah for help.
    What makes this film so special is that it shows the weaknesses and dignities of both sides without favoritism for either. Mohammeds family is one of privilege that has been reduced by the occupation. I actually felt badly when the Israelis invade the home. The film is rich with excellent acting by the cast which is both Jewish and Muslim. Mohammed Bakri is absolutely brilliant as the father who subtlely conveys a commanding presence as well as man who has been humiliated in front of his family and does not know how to recover his authority. He struggles to keep his family from harm while at the same time attempting to maintain a sense of dignity in the face of insult.
    We get a peek at the reality of the Israeli occupation and we see what we probably did not know before. Political realities are powerful and this film is powerful. It will not "entertain" you in the way other films do but it will certainly give you something to think about,

    Similar Item
  • Until When...
  • Color of Olives, The
  • From Mexican director Carolina Rivas and cinematographer Daoud Sarhandi comes this elegant and visually breathtaking new film about the Palestinian experience. The Amer family lives surrounded by the infamous West Bank Wall, where their daily lives a
  • Gaza Strip
  • DescriptionIn January of 2001, American director James Longley traveled to the Gaza Strip. His plan was to stay for two weeks to collect preliminary material for a documentary film on the Palestinian Intifada. It was during his stay that Ariel Shar
  • Encounter Point
  • Just when the world is losing hope about the possibility of resolving the Palestinian-Israeli conflict comes ENCOUNTER POINT. Created by a Palestinian, Israeli, North and South American team, ENCOUNTER POINT moves beyond sensational and dogmatic imag
  • Paradise Now
  • Amazon.comTwo men, best friends from childhood, are summoned to fulfill their agreement to be suicide bombers for the Palestinian cause. Khaled and Said (Ali Suliman and Kais Nashef, both making striking film debuts) believe fervently in their cause,

    วันเสาร์ที่ 28 กุมภาพันธ์ พ.ศ. 2552

    วันศุกร์ที่ 27 กุมภาพันธ์ พ.ศ. 2552

    Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid

    Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid

    Amazon.com Review


    The crowning achievement of Jimmy Carters presidency was the Camp David Accords between Israel and Egypt, and he has continued his public and private diplomacy ever since, winning the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002 for his decades of work for peace, human rights, and international development. He has been a tireless author since then as well, writing bestselling books on his childhood, his faith, and American history and politics, but in Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid, he has returned to the Middle East and to the question of Israels peace with its neighbors--in particular, how Israeli sovereignty and security can coexist permanently and peacefully with Palestinian nationhood.

    Its a rare honor to ask questions of a former president, and we are grateful that President Carter was able to take the time in between his work with his wife, Rosalynn, for the Carter Center and Habitat for Humanity and his many writing projects to speak with us about his hopes for the region and his thoughts on the book.

    A big thank you to President Carter for granting our request for an interview.


    An Interview with President Jimmy Carter

    Q: What has been the importance of your own faith in your continued interest in peace in the Middle East?
    A: As a Christian, I worship the Prince of Peace. One of my preeminent commitments has been to bring peace to the people who live in the Holy Land. I made my best efforts as president and still have this as a high priority.

    Q: A common theme in your years of Middle East diplomacy has been that leaders on both sides have often been more open to discussion and change in private than in public. Do you think thats still the case?
    A: Yes. This is why private and intense negotiations can be successful. More accurately, however, my premise has been that the general public (Jewish, Christian, and Muslim) are more eager for peace than their political leaders. For instance, a recent poll done by the Hebrew University in Jerusalem showed that 58% of Israelis and 81% of the Palestinians favor a comprehensive settlement similar to the Roadmap for Peace or the Saudi proposal adopted by all 23 Arab nations and recently promoted by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Tragically, there have been no substantive peace talks during the past six years.

    Q: How have the war in Iraq and the increased strength of Iran (and the declarations of their leaders against Israel) changed the conditions of the Israel-Palestine question?
    A: Other existing or threatened conflicts in the region greatly increase the importance of Israels having peace agreements with its neighbors, to minimize overall Arab animosity toward both Israel and the United States and reduce the threat of a broader conflict.

    Q: Your use of the term "apartheid" has been a lightning rod in the response to your book. Could you explain your choice? Were you surprised by the reaction?
    A: The book is about Palestine, the occupied territories, and not about Israel. Forced segregation in the West Bank and terrible oppression of the Palestinians create a situation accurately described by the word. I made it plain in the text that this abuse is not based on racism, but on the desire of a minority of Israelis to confiscate and colonize Palestinian land. This violates the basic humanitarian premises on which the nation of Israel was founded. My surprise is that most critics of the book have ignored the facts about Palestinian persecution and its proposals for future peace and resorted to personal attacks on the author. No one could visit the occupied territories and deny that the book is accurate.

    Q: You write in the book that "the peace process does not have a life of its own it is not self-sustaining." What would you recommend that the next American president do to revive it?
    A: I would not want to wait two more years. It is encouraging that President George W. Bush has announced that peace in the Holy Land will be a high priority for his administration during the next two years. On her January trip to the region, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has called for early U.S.-Israeli-Palestinian peace talks. She has recommended the 2002 offer of the Arab nations as a foundation for peace: full recognition of Israel based on a return to its internationally recognized borders. This offer is compatible with official U.S. Government policy, previous agreements approved by Israeli governments in 1978 and 1993, and with the International Quartets "roadmap for peace." My book proposes that, through negotiated land swaps, this "green line" border be modified to permit a substantial number of Israelis settlers to remain in Palestine. With strong U.S. pressure, backed by the U.N., Russia, and the European Community, Israelis and Palestinians would have to come to the negotiating table.

    1/18/2007

    More to Explore


    Our Endangered Values


    Sharing Good Times

    An Hour Before Daylight

    From Publishers Weekly
    The term "good-faith" is almost inappropriate when applied to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, a bloody struggle interrupted every so often by negotiations that turn out to be anything but honest. Nonetheless, thirty years after his first trip to the Mideast, former President Jimmy Carter still has hope for a peaceful, comprehensive solution to the regions troubles, delivering this informed and readable chronicle as an offering to the cause. An engineer of the 1978 Camp David Accords and 2002 recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, Carter would seem to be a perfect emissary in the Middle East, an impartial and uniting diplomatic force in a fractured land. Not entirely so. Throughout his work, Carter assigns ultimate blame to Israel, arguing that the countrys leadership has routinely undermined the peace process through its obstinate, aggressive and illegal occupation of territories seized in 1967. Hes decidedly less critical of Arab leaders, accepting their concern for the Palestinian cause at face value, and including their anti-Israel rhetoric as a matter of course, without much in the way of counter-argument. Carters book provides a fine overview for those unfamiliar with the history of the conflict and lays out an internationally accepted blueprint for peace.
    Copyright Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    Product Description


    PRESIDENT CARTERS COURAGEOUS ASSESSMENT OF WHAT MUST BE DONE TO BRING PERMANENT PEACE TO ISRAEL WITH DIGNITY AND JUSTICE TO PALESTINE
    Rate Points :4.0
    Binding :Paperback
    Label :Simon & Schuster
    Manufacturer :Simon & Schuster
    ProductGroup :Book
    Studio :Simon & Schuster
    Publisher :Simon & Schuster
    EAN :9780743285032
    Price :$15.00USD
    Lowest Price :$3.93USD
    Customer ReviewsLopsided struggle in the worlds anger cauldron
    Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :0
    Tireless peacemaker Jimmy Carter promised while running for president before 1976 to work for peace in the Middle East, and long after his presidency ended he has been consistently keeping his promise. By reaching out, by meeting with top leaders and players to this recurring Middle Eastern drama, by speaking with common people including Palestinians, by his steadfast and unwavering diplomatic efforts, and by writing this tough, fair, open-minded and heart wrenching book, he has demonstrated repeatedly his commitment to peace. He is a peacemaker extraordinaire.

    That three continents join in a dangerous intersection practically guarantees conflict. Palestine is caught between two cradles of civilization -- the Nile and the Tigris/Euphrates regions -- has seen plenty of bloodshed throughout history, and will probably continue to do so as long as mankind roams the planet. Various groups have fought over this land since time immemorial. And today it is still a war cauldron, an "incubator of terrorism" as the former president writes, in which Israelis hunger for Arab land, and Palestinians hate Israelis. There are no easy solutions. Nevertheless, Jimmy Carter believes large swaths of both peoples hunger for peace, and he advocates a blueprint: (1) Israels right to exist must be acknowledged within recognized borders (he prefers the 1949-1967 border lines) (2) stop killing of noncombatants (3) Palestinians must live in peace and dignity in their own land. Jimmy Carter wants peace through international law, free speech, self-determination, equal treatment, freedom from military domination.

    Jimmy Carter outlines the history of the conflict, even back to biblical times, but focuses on the last half century. He recounts meetings with Israeli and Palestinian officials, as well as with important players throughout the region.

    His account is a strong indictment of US foreign policy which has been inconsistent, sometimes hypocritical, ineffective, and has aroused strong anger throughout the Arab region while achieving little benefit. He criticizes "...Washingtons strange policy that dialog on controversial issues is a privilege to be extended only as a reward for subservient behavior and withheld from those who reject US demands". The Bush II administration practically abandoned a peace effort which Jimmy Carter clearly views as a mistake. He outlines the dispute in terms of numbers, major agreements, setbacks, and important events. Israel has two main factions -- a hardline, militant, expansionist group (Likud party), and a peace-loving, treaty-abiding, more affluent group (Labor party).

    But the undeniable picture that emerges is a pattern of consistent bullying by Israelis. Its a lopsided struggle. Palestinians have few rights, are denied permits to travel and work, are treated collectively as terrorists, have scant access to Israeli lawyers or courts. Their homes are bulldozed, confiscated. Their fruit trucks are blocked at entry points for days until the cargo perishes. Their olive trees are cut down in droves, their water diverted, their schools & universities closed, their grounds covered in untreated sewage, their library books are censored. And the pattern is increased expansion of Israeli settlements and a consistent policy of harassment of Palestinians who are treated as foreigners in their own land.

    A case could be made that Gaza, a small strip of Palestinian land on the Mediterranean, is the worlds largest prison, as reporter Bob Simon said recently. Per capita income in Gaza has declined 40% during the past three years 70% live in poverty workers are prevented from going to outside jobs police and teachers are deprived of salaries. Gaza is extremely crowded with over 3,700 people per square kilometer. The most recent Israeli hostility has been to build a huge, meandering wall in the West Bank which cuts off many Palestinians from each other the Palestinian town of Bethlehem is practically encircled. A UN court in July 2004 determined the wall was "illegal" but it is still being built under the pretext of keeping out suicide bombers. What will happen? "It is obvious that the Palestinians will be left with no territory to establish a viable state, but completely enclosed within the barrier and the occupied Jordan valley", he writes. It also cuts off 200,000 Palestinians in Jerusalem from their relatives. His word is apt: apartheid.

    Coverage in US media tends to be highly skewed in favor of Israel. Most of the Israeli abuse goes under the radar, while the occasional Arab suicide bomber makes headlines. For example, in July 2006, Hamas militants captured an Israeli soldier, and the massive bombardment and re-invasion by Israels military was a lopsided response to this aggression. So most Americans who arent paying attention may easily conclude that the fighting in the Middle East is balanced, shrug their shoulders, and return to a state of cluelessness. He writes "...most American citizens are unaware of circumstances in the occupied territories". And America, indirectly, supports much of this atrocity by siding with Israel in international bodies such as the United Nations as well as providing aid.

    As an American, I see Jimmy Carters book as confirmation that American democracy is broken, dysfunctional, distorted. That American foreign policy has been so unthinking over such a long time suggests that the flaw isnt with one or two errant administrations, but that the foreign policy architecture itself is flawed. I think the flaws are deep, systemic, structural. Americans are not really citizens anymore clearly, in this instance, Americans are not paying attention. The only political participation is voting for president (see Dana D. Nelsons excellent "Bad for Democracy"). Congress is corrupt over 90% of incumbents win re-election. And the federal system has broken down, since Washington has usurped the power of individual state governments to regulate their respective economies. The only solution, in my view, is to craft an alternative Constitution. So I have summoned over 100 of Americas brightest and most knowledgeable thinkers as well as persons with the power, celebrity, and media savvy to cause change, to Independence Hall in Philadelphia beginning July 4, 2009, to craft an alternative Constitution, based on the current one, to fix flaws including the foreign policy function, and for this document to be voted on by the public at a later date.

    Jimmy Carter has shown time and again that he is one of the most enlightened, caring, and intelligent Americans, and I am inviting him to be a delegate to this Convention, and I hope he decides to attend. Last, I offer a solution to the problem of terrorism in my book (below) and challenge every thinker to debate the merits of my proposed, non-partisan strategy.

    Thomas W. Sulcer
    author of "Common Sense II: How to Prevent the Three Types of Terrorism" (Amazon)

    the real thing
    Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :0
    its just to tell you the real thing about how hard to have peace when the Israeli act this way
    lies
    Rating Point :1 Helpful Point :0
    Heres a classical example of how pure antisemitic views turn to history rewriting. Pure anti Israeli and anti Jewish propaganda. Too bad people believe these lies (if they really want to). Carter does not justifies his claims, nor does he give a realistic perspective of the Palestinian problem. Read Mike Evans, Joan Peters for a historical approach to the problem.
    A brilliant mind offers a solution
    Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :1
    What an incredible man. His vision needs to be looked at with great circumspection. He isnt prejudiced against any country. He offers
    a solution,with compassion and heart,but also with practicality.
    Excellent book.
    HOW SHOULD A PRESIDENT THINK
    Rating Point :2 Helpful Point :0
    I have no particular opinion on the situation in the Middle East. I read this book several times. It is highly disturbing to me: Not because of any favoritism toward any group in the region, but because he states and evidently believes whole-heartedly that human actions can impact natural law.

    The notion that any action of any sort by any president can be based at all on the notion that the economy of the universe is going to be altered is frightening. Having Alexander I Czar of Russia with all sorts of mystical notions does not endanger the survival of mankind. Having a president of the US with such a notion and the control of the H-Bomb does.
    Similar Item
  • We Can Have Peace in the Holy Land: A Plan That Will Work
  • In this urgent, balanced, and passionate book, Nobel Peace Laureate and former President Jimmy Carter argues that the present moment is a unique time for achieving peace in the Middle East -- and he offers a bold and comprehensive plan to do just tha
  • Our Endangered Values: America's Moral Crisis
  • The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream (Vintage)
  • The Audacity of Hope is Barack Obamas call for a new kind of politicsa politics that builds upon those shared understandings that pull us together as Americans. Lucid in his vision of Americas place in the world, refreshingly candid about his family
  • The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy
  • The Israel Lobby, by John J. Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago and Stephen M. Walt of Harvards John F. Kennedy School of Government, was one of the most controversial articles in recent memory. Originally published in the London Review of Book
  • The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine
  • In this controversial new book, a prominent Israeli historian at Haifa University revisits the formative period of the State of Israel. Decisively debunking the myth that the Palestinian population left of their own accord during the War of Independe

    วันพฤหัสบดีที่ 26 กุมภาพันธ์ พ.ศ. 2552

    Beyond Chutzpah: On The Misuse Of Anti-Semitism And The Abuse Of History

    Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History

    Product Description


    Meticulously researched and tightly argued, Beyond Chutzpah points to a consensus among historians and human rights organizations on the factual record of the Israel-Palestine conflict. Norman G. Finkelstein exposes the corruption of scholarship and the contrivance of controversy shrouding human rights abuses, and interrogates the new anti-Semitism. This paperback edition adds a preface analyzing recent developments in the conflict, and a new afterword on Israels construction of a wall in the West Bank.
    Rate Points :4.0
    Binding :Paperback
    Label :University of California Press
    Manufacturer :University of California Press
    ProductGroup :Book
    Studio :University of California Press
    Publisher :University of California Press
    EAN :9780520249899
    Price :$15.95USD
    Lowest Price :$10.31USD
    Customer ReviewsAint that the truth?
    Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :9
    People are finally realizing that weve been psychologically blackmailed, for many years, by the likes of Dershowitz, against making any critical statements against Israel for the fear of being labeled Anti-Semitic. This book explains the process of how this came about. So much so that Dershowitz himself pushed for this book to be banned! Harvard University should kick this clown out of their faculty. Does anyone doubt where his allegiance really is? The backlash against Israel in the US has begun.
    An essay about the truth
    Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :19
    The book is a classic and I will not discuss it further. I will add that Finkelstein is a martyr for the truth. His courageous exposure of Zionist and Israeli attempts to manipulate the truth and deny it has cost him dear. He got fired from his academic position courtesy of pressure on his univeristy by the Zionist Lobby and was recently disinvited to appear before the Oxford Union again due to pressure from the Zionist Lobby that fears a truth-teller like Finkelstein and wants to silence him.
    Pure propaganda
    Rating Point :1 Helpful Point :0
    Another Jewish American tries to catch our attention by making a scandal. I thought puberty ends at the age of 17-18. It is also worth noticing that it is beyond chutzpah that we dont find the authors name if there is no addition - the son/child of the Holocaust survivor. SO, who makes industry of it after all?
    meticulously documented
    Rating Point :4 Helpful Point :13
    Norman Finkelstein can be accussed of many things: being a pedant, using strident sarcasm in his writing, having a large ego. One thing, however, that no serious scholar would accuse him of is sloppy scholarship. Finkelstein does not go half way he goes all the way. The products of his obsessive, "forensic" scholarhsip are highly informative, moarlistic, hard to read books.

    Beyond Chutzpah is more of the same. The only difference in this book is that the reader can feel more Chomsky in the acrid, dry humour of Finkelstein. At least the guy is blunt and pulls no punches. The book focuses on two things: part 1 debunks the idea that their is a new antisemitism in the air. According to Finkelstein, this idea serves as a distracting technique to keep serious citizens from questioning Israeli policy. On this score, he is right on. Their is no doubt that this is the case. Part 2 uses the meretricious book, The Case For Israel, by Alan D. as a prop to set straight Israels human rights record. Along the way Dershowitz is ground into the dust like grain under a milstone. More importantly, after reading this section the reader will hardly be able to believe that Israels human rights record should serve as a beacon to other nations. If anything, it is a blight on the massive page of the follies, crimes, and misfortunes of mankind.

    Beyond Chutzpah ends with technical appendices challenging the veracity of Dershowitzs scholarship. I wont get into this here (see my review of The Case For Israel if you are interested) since it would spoil the most entertaining chapters of Finkelsteins book.

    Overall, this book is a meticulously documented, scrupulously honest account of Israels record and the cynical nature of Israels "friends." As a reader deeply involved in the issue of Israel/Palestine, I deeply respect the scholarhsip of Finkelstein. Yes, one can regret his pugilistic tone, but, more important than such quirks are his virtues. After this book, you will never take anything Alan Dershowitz says seriously, and this is a good thing.


    Finkelstein did it again
    Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :0
    Very readable. Ironically, this is the book that got him fired. But that does not take away from his thesis. If anything, it reinforces it. Scary.
    Similar Item
  • The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine
  • In this controversial new book, a prominent Israeli historian at Haifa University revisits the formative period of the State of Israel. Decisively debunking the myth that the Palestinian population left of their own accord during the War of Independe
  • The Power of Israel in the United States
  • This book is a chapter-by-chapter analysis and documentation of the power of Israel via the Israeli, Jewish or Pro-Zionist Lobby on US Middle East policy. It raises serious questions as to the primary beneficiary of US policy, and its destruct
  • Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict, New and Revised Edition
  • The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy
  • The Israel Lobby, by John J. Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago and Stephen M. Walt of Harvards John F. Kennedy School of Government, was one of the most controversial articles in recent memory. Originally published in the London Review of Book
  • The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering, New Edition 2nd Edition
  • วันพุธที่ 25 กุมภาพันธ์ พ.ศ. 2552

    The Iron Cage: The Story Of The Palestinian Struggle For Statehood

    The Iron Cage: The Story of the Palestinian Struggle for Statehood

    Product Description


    A timely and compelling examination of the Palestinian dilemma, named one of the 100 best books of the year by Publishers Weekly

    In Resurrecting Empire, Rashid Khalidi dissected the failures of colonial policy over the entire span of the modern history of the Middle East, predicted the meltdown in Iraq that we are now witnessing with increasing horror, and offered viable alternatives for achieving peace in the region. His newest book, The Iron Cage, hones in on Palestinian politics and history. Once again Khalidi draws on a wealth of experience and scholarship to elucidate the current conflict, using history to provide a clear-eyed view of the situation today.

    The story of the Palestinian search to establish a state begins in the era of British control over Palestine and stretches between the two world wars, when colonial control of the region became increasingly unpopular and power began to shift toward the United States. In this crucial period, and in the years immediately following World War II, Palestinian leaders were unable to achieve the long-cherished goal of establishing an independent statea critical failure that throws a bright light on the efforts of the Palestinians to create a state in the many decades since 1948. By frankly discussing the reasons behind this failure, Khalidi offers a much-needed perspective for anyone concerned about peace in the Middle East.

    Rashid Khalidi is a historians historian. The Iron Cage is his most accomplished effort to date . . . Magisterial in scope, meticulous in its attention to detail, and decidedly dispassionate in its analysis, The Iron Cage is destined to be a benchmark of its genre. Joel Schalit, Tikkun

    At heart a historical essay, an effort to decide why the Palestinians . . . have failed to achieve an independent state. Steven Erlanger, New York Times

    Khalidi, tackling historical amnesia, brilliantly analyses the structural handicap which hobbled the Palestinians throughout 30 years of British rule . . . Khalidi restores the Palestinians to something more than victims, acknowledging that for all their disadvantages, they have played their role and can (and must) still do so to determine their own fate. Ian Black, Guardian

    Khalidi uses history to provide a clear-eyed view of the region and assess the prospects for peace. He strives successfully for even-handedness. Anthony Lewis, author of Gideons Trumpet and Make No Law

    . . . we have to open a dialogue with Hamasnot to embrace it, but to lay out a gradual pathway that will bring it into relations with Israel. As Rashid Khalidi, Columbia Universitys Palestinian expert and author of The Iron Cage points out: If we let the Palestinian Authority be destroyed, and then we keep Hamas isolatedeven though it won a democratic election that we sponsoredwe will end up with the hard boys, the gangs you see today on the streets of Gaza, who respond to no authority at all. New York Times, Thomas L. Friedman

    Rate Points :4.0
    Binding :Paperback
    Label :Beacon Press
    Manufacturer :Beacon Press
    ProductGroup :Book
    Studio :Beacon Press
    Publisher :Beacon Press
    EAN :9780807003091
    Price :$15.00USD
    Lowest Price :$7.99USD
    Customer ReviewsNot a unique predicament
    Rating Point :4 Helpful Point :1
    Most analysis of the Palestinian failure to achieve nationhood suggests that this is a unique predicament, and looks at flaws within the Palestinian leadership, the Palestinian organizing, the Palestinian strategies used, etc, to explain this "failure," and often to to justify the Israeli atrocities--as if a weakness of the part of the victim ever justified abuse.
    Even one of the reviews posted here states that, with the exception of Palestine, "most countries have achieved national independence." Such analysis fails to take into consideration that there are entire continents, namely the Americas, from Canada to Argentina, as well as Australia, along with New Zealand, and various colonized islands around the globe, where the indigenous peoples have NOT achieved national independence.
    As such, the plight of the Palestinians is not a unique predicament, it is one manifestation among many that historical and scholarly academic discourses can be so distorted and short-sighted as to blind themselves to half the world.
    Possibly the main difference between Palestinians and Indigenous peoples of other countries, and even entire continents, is that the Palestinians have achieved an international recognition of the validity of their struggle for, and right to, nationhood. This is indeed a great accomplishment, considering the immense international pressure to invalidate that claim--beginning with the denial that the Palestinians actually exist as a people, let alone need to have a nation.
    The Origins of Apartheid in Israel and Palestine
    Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :6
    In the 1980s, Israels "new historians" challenged a Zionist narrative that had been publicly unquestioned in Israel and the United States. Among these historians and those of us who have followed their work, Israel could never again be viewed as an underdog David challenged by an Arab Goliath. Since then, much of the debate among those who are increasingly critical of Israels actions has instead addressed the problem of whether this biblical metaphor should in fact be turned on its head. Although there has for decades been much evidence to support this argument, three recent, well-researched books have made it virtually uncontroversial to assert that the post-World War I Zionist movement, sponsored by superpowers Britain and the U.S. (and indeed by the Soviet Union immediately after World War II), should no more be seen as the underdog than we now see British or Spanish colonialists in relation to Native Americans. In turn, Palestinians can no more be sensibly called anti-Semitic than indigenous Americans can be called "anti-European."

    These three books evoke the essence of the Zionist-Palestinian conflict with metaphors of confinement, separation, and exclusion: the "iron cage," the "iron wall," and the "glass wall." In The Iron Cage: The Story of the Palestinian Struggle for Statehood, Palestinian-American Professor Rashid Khalidi documents British support for a Jewish national movement in Palestine since World War I, and opposition to a Palestinian national movement, most violently during the revolt of 1936-39. The League of Nations Mandate for Palestine, by which the British ruled from 1923-1948, endorsed a "national home" for the Jewish people while never citing the Palestinians by name. Thus, "the (90%) Arab majority was effectively ignored as a national and political entity."

    This favoritism was reflected in the brutal suppression of the Palestinian revolt, which effectively decimated Palestinian leadership and resistance thereafter. It was also reflected in the passivity with which Britain responded after World War II both to Zionist terrorism against the British administration, and to the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians which began well before the end of the mandate in May 1948. It has long been conventional Israeli wisdom that the Zionist movement had to confront both a British Goliath and an Arab Goliath, all in the wake of the Holocaust. It is clear that the Zionist David allied itself with the British Goliath, not only overwhelming a Palestinian national movement with profound internal problems, but violently "transferring" over 700,000 Palestinians with relatively little resistance.

    In The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, Israeli historian Ilan Papp has documented the violent expulsion of the Palestinians from the end of 1947 into 1949. It has long been established that the Palestinians fled not in response to "Arab broadcasts," but to violent intimidation by Jewish forces, including unprovoked massacres. Based on Papps meticulous research, it is now clear that this ethnic cleansing was premeditated, not retaliatory, and half completed before the feeble intervention of Arab armies in May of 1948. "Official Israeli historiography describes April 1948 as a turning point. . . . If there was a turning point in April, it was the shift from sporadic attacks and counter-attacks on the Palestinian civilian population toward the systematic mega-operation of ethnic cleansing that now followed." This ethnic cleansing was based on a belief among Israeli leaders that an "iron wall" would be required to separate a Jews from Palestinians, who were understood then as now to pose not a military but demographic threat to a Jewish state.

    This demographic threat is addressed by Jonathan Cook, a British journalist based in the Arab Israeli city of Nazareth, in Blood and Religion: The Unmasking of the Jewish and Democratic State. The 150,000 Palestinians who remained in Israel after 1948 are now over 1 million, over 20% of the population, a percentage that increases due to their high birthrate. This presents a problem for a Jewish state that has used a harshly and "legal" discriminatory "glass wall" between its Arab and Jewish citizens that is "needed to cloak the contradictions inherent in the concept of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state." These contradictions have been exposed recently by Israeli attacks on unarmed Palestinian civilians during the outbreak of the intifada in 2000, by increasing and unwarranted suspicion of the loyalty of historically quiescent Arab Israelis who demand social equality, and by increasing calls for expulsion by popular right-wing politicians. All of this has resulted in plans to re-draw borders in order to transfer as many as a quarter of Israels Palestinian citizens to a future Palestinian state, an outcome in no way supported by those effected.

    Metaphors of separation, confinement, and exclusion are made literally concrete by the separation wall that has been built inside the occupied West Bank. While largely invisible to Israelis, in areas where visible to Israelis it has been, according to Cook, "painted with murals on the Israeli side, reimagining the view that was now missing while making sure that it was empty of the Palestinian villages that could be seen before its construction." Papp adds that also eliminated are "the people who live in them."

    Tell It To the Smear Artists
    Rating Point :4 Helpful Point :8
    The McCain campaign has basically tried to ruin this mans life in order to pick up a few votes in Florida. And they did so by systematically lying about his work, not to mention his affiliations. This kind of McCarthyism has no place in America. Im buying Rashid Khalidis book as a way of pushing back, and letting the smear merchants know that their bile will not work this time.

    Bile approved by John McCain.
    Great research, shocking editing
    Rating Point :4 Helpful Point :4
    I really enjoyed this account of Palestinian history, but it was a struggle to overcome the first two chapters of poor editing (though otherwise well researched). The book provided me with a greater understanding of the Palestinian struggle, its failures, the contributions -both external (Zionism, European and US collaboration)- & internal (a lack of experience in state-running and the resulting chaos & infighting). I had read Fisk and Pappes accounts of the Oslo accords and their stranglehold on the Palestinian way of life, but Khalidi provided even further insider knowledge into how everyday life has been controlled and restricted with breathtaking similarities to apartheid. The cynical nature of pre-talk agreements between Israel and the US prior to coming to the tables with whatever Palestinian delegation was sent (usually the wrong one) ensured that Israel was starting the debate on a far superior footing to an already muted Palestinian delegation. "Iron Cage" does do justice to the manner in which Palestinians now live, to Europe, Zionists (not world Jewry as is constantly falsely claimed), and the USs eternal shame.
    A Corrective Lense
    Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :8
    It is no secret that American media--controlled by corporate interests throughout the world--is highly selective and biased in its reportage of international issues that impact us every day. The Iron Cage, along with The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict, New and Revised Edition, Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History, and others, provide a carefully documented and refreshing perspective on the current core issue of the Middle-East. They are a sorely needed corrective lense for the media distortions called "news".
    Similar Item
  • Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History
  • Meticulously researched and tightly argued, Beyond Chutzpah points to a consensus among historians and human rights organizations on the factual record of the Israel-Palestine conflict. Norman G. Finkelstein exposes the corruption of scholarship and
  • The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine
  • In this controversial new book, a prominent Israeli historian at Haifa University revisits the formative period of the State of Israel. Decisively debunking the myth that the Palestinian population left of their own accord during the War of Independe
  • Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid
  • PRESIDENT CARTERS COURAGEOUS ASSESSMENT OF WHAT MUST BE DONE TO BRING PERMANENT PEACE TO ISRAEL WITH DIGNITY AND JUSTICE TO PALESTINEAmazon.com ReviewThe crowning achievement of Jimmy Carters presidency was the Camp David Accords between Isra
  • Resurrecting Empire: Western Footprints and America's Perilous Path in the Middle East
  • The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy
  • The Israel Lobby, by John J. Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago and Stephen M. Walt of Harvards John F. Kennedy School of Government, was one of the most controversial articles in recent memory. Originally published in the London Review of Book

    The Israel Lobby And U.S. Foreign Policy

    The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy

    Product Description


    The Israel Lobby, by John J. Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago and Stephen M. Walt of Harvards John F. Kennedy School of Government, was one of the most controversial articles in recent memory. Originally published in the London Review of Books in March 2006, it provoked both howls of outrage and cheers of gratitude for challenging what had been a taboo issue in America: the impact of the Israel lobby on U.S. foreign policy. Now in a work of major importance, Mearsheimer and Walt deepen and expand their argument and confront recent developments in Lebanon and Iran. They describe the remarkable level of material and diplomatic support that the United States provides to Israel and argues that this support cannot be fully explained on either strategic or moral grounds. This exceptional relationship is due largely to the political influence of a loose coalition of individuals and organizations that actively work to shape U.S. foreign policy in a pro-Israel direction. Mearsheimer and Walt provocatively contend that the lobby has a far-reaching impact on Americas posture throughout the Middle Eastin Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, and toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflictand the policies it has encouraged are in neither Americas national interest nor Israels long-term interest. The lobbys influence also affects Americas relationship with important allies and increases dangers that all states face from global jihadist terror. Writing in The New York Review of Books, Michael Massing declared, Not since Foreign Affairs magazine published Samuel Huntingtons The Clash of Civilizations? in 1993 has an academic essay detonated with such force. The publication of The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy is certain to widen the debate and to be one of the most talked-about books of the year.

    Rate Points :4.0
    Binding :Paperback
    Label :Farrar, Straus and Giroux
    Manufacturer :Farrar, Straus and Giroux
    ProductGroup :Book
    Studio :Farrar, Straus and Giroux
    Publisher :Farrar, Straus and Giroux
    EAN :9780374531508
    Price :$15.00USD
    Lowest Price :$8.54USD
    Customer ReviewsAre the Authors Anti-Semites? Maybe Not. But Anti-Semites LOVE this book.
    Rating Point :1 Helpful Point :2
    I just saw a video of Walt. In the course of 30:40 he denied that he was an anti-Semite so many times, I lost count. And perhaps he isnt an anti-Semite, but he is certainly defensive about it.

    Maybe he isnt an anti-Semite. But anti-Semites LOVE this book.

    Many, many reviewers comment that this book is shoddy scholarship. "Shoddy" is not a word generally associated with the Ivy League. But if the aim was to produce something very quickly, so as to be able to market it and attract invitations from the speakers circuit, then the book did its job well. He will be speaking mostly to "activists," who really dont want "scholarship," but rather need to have their own prejudices confirmed and articulated in pithy slogans. This book will serve well those who, in spite of their affiliation with universities, like to highly reduce complex situations into "good" and "evil." It will certainly please those who usually presume that anything Western is bad and that anything Third World is good. It will be adored by those who define Israel as "right wing," racist" "apartheid" "militaristic" and "right wing," but forgive any Arab infraction as "left wing," no matter how authoritarian, misogynist racist, anti-Semitic, or homophobic. "Political correctness" stops at our shores.

    Ill tell you one thing: he cant pronounce a Hebrew word correctly.

    Of course when he spoke to CAIR, I understand that he used the terms "Jewish lobby" more freely. I suppose he thought there were no Jews there or that it wasnt being recorded.

    After he penned his initial essay in London, he lamented that he couldnt ever publish this in the USA. There would be too much fallout form "the lobby." Of course that was before he signed his lucrative book contract. Now he (nicely) supplements his professors salary spreading his "warnings" on college campuses from coast to coast.

    But since he is "very scholarly" and "very fair" and since we are supposed to believe that he doesnt have an agenda, why doesnt he also write a book called "The Oil Lobby"? Then he can neurotically deny to everybody that he is not anti-Muslim, too.
    everything as promised
    Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :2
    great book. quite thorough and informative and based on factual information in contrast to most nonsense nowadays in the age of cable talking heads and their useless opinions. highly recommend it to anyone interested in the subject along with jimmy carters palestine peace not appartheid.
    Striking!
    Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :1
    Great book on the functioning and effectiveness of the Isrel loby and its dramatic effect on the US foreign policy. I could not find any "anti-semitist" statement in the book. Yet, the accusations to the authors after their article show how untolerating and silencing the loby is. The US public needs to be a lot more aware on the issues discussed in the book and this is a perfect book to get a good idea. To my opinion, improved public awareness is pretty much the only way to bring the power of loby to proportion.
    I salute these courageous writers for their courage and their outstanding scholarship.
    Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :3
    A book long overdue, "The Israeli Lobby" exposes how pro-Israel Americans work to influence US politics towards policies and decisions that favor Israel at the expense of the United States.

    I could go on in detail about how this book is a veritable jewel that exposes the pro-Israel lobbyists in our country - but I dont want to spoil anything for anybody. Guaranteed to anger, shock, and bewilder you.

    Read it with an open mind - this work may be one of the most important books about US politics and US foreign relations written in many years.
    A Hard Truth
    Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :1
    Anyone who is not biased will find this book hard to negate. If one uses their common sense and has questioned why they do not understand US foreign policy, they will finally understand.

    For decades Middle East policy has been shaped by The Israel Lobby(s). I do not find this hard to believe- I have watched an AIPAC conference on CNN. Our senators and Congressmen look like babies beggin for candy.

    Mearsheimer and Walt are successful in proving that Israel is no longer a strategic asset to the United States but rather a strategic liability as they are a country who does not follow international law. Isreal has a nuclear weapons program for which they have not sigened The Non-Proliferation Treaty, have occupied the Palestine for more thatn forty years and continue to deny the palestinians basic human rights and political representation and then cry when Hamas sends rockets into their country. Despite these actions we still give them unconditional aid of 3 Billion dollars a year along with military and other aid that amounts to hundreds of millions more. Not to mention we have to pay all their neighbors billion to be friendly with them !

    Now onto the real problem, lobiies like AIPAC WINEP have an extrememly organized public relations funtion in the US that halts the truth about Israels behavior and censors any dissent against Israeli/lobby actions.Officials cannot get elected if they do not pledge their allegiance to Israel. The lobby presents American and Israeli issues to be one in the same.M and W clearly explain how ludicrous this is, no two countries ever have the same issues. The lobby also uses the media to show that AMerica and Israel have "the same values". M and W also prove this is not true, Israel does not come close to Americas values- they are still a racist country !

    Israel essentially wants the backing of US military and gov.to aid in wars in the Middle East and refuse to negotiate with any country in the Midle East, their only option is war.Consequently, it is our troops that will suffer going to war, not Israeli troops.

    If you think your congressman or Senator is aginst this, wrong. If they do not vote in favor of Israeli legislation, the lobby will fund their opponents come election tim eto see to it to smear their image and have them voted out of office.

    This is a great book that has finally started the debate on the role of the lobby on US foreign policy and how it is damaging security and global standing for Americans.

    It would seem that our only alternative to the lobby is to start getting Americans involved in the political process as the lobby itself has boasted that "it has no opponents" and our elected officials have stated that if the AMerican people would voice their concerns (which they do not)then they would have a reason to vote aginst pro-Israel legislation.


    Similar Item
  • The Power of Israel in the United States
  • This book is a chapter-by-chapter analysis and documentation of the power of Israel via the Israeli, Jewish or Pro-Zionist Lobby on US Middle East policy. It raises serious questions as to the primary beneficiary of US policy, and its destruct
  • The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism
  • In this groundbreaking alternative history of the most dominant ideology of our time, Milton Friedmans free-market economic revolution, Naomi Klein challenges the popular myth of this movements peaceful global victory. From Chile in 1973 to Iraq toda
  • Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid
  • PRESIDENT CARTERS COURAGEOUS ASSESSMENT OF WHAT MUST BE DONE TO BRING PERMANENT PEACE TO ISRAEL WITH DIGNITY AND JUSTICE TO PALESTINEAmazon.com ReviewThe crowning achievement of Jimmy Carters presidency was the Camp David Accords between Isra
  • The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine
  • In this controversial new book, a prominent Israeli historian at Haifa University revisits the formative period of the State of Israel. Decisively debunking the myth that the Palestinian population left of their own accord during the War of Independe
  • Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History
  • วันอังคารที่ 24 กุมภาพันธ์ พ.ศ. 2552

    The Power Of Israel In The United States

    The Power of Israel in the United States

    Product Description


    This book is a chapter-by-chapter analysis and documentation of the power of Israel via the Israeli, Jewish or Pro-Zionist Lobby on US Middle East policy. It raises serious questions as to the primary beneficiary of US policy, and its destructive results for the United States. The extraordinary extent of US political, economic, military and diplomatic support for the state of Israel is explored, along with the means whereby such support is generated and consolidated. Contending that Zionist power in America ensured unconditional US backing for Israeli colonization of Palestine and its massive uprooting of Palestinians, it views the interests of Israel rather than those of Big Oil as the primary cause of the disastrous US wars against Iraq and threats of war against Iran and Syria. It demonstrates and condemns US imitation of Israeli practice as it relates to conduct of the war on terrorism and torture. It sheds light on the AIPAC spying scandal and other Israeli espionage against America the fraudulent and complicit role of Americas academic "terrorist experts" in furthering criminal government policies, and the orchestration of the Danish cartoons to foment antipathy between Muslims and the West. It questions the inability in America to sustain or even formulate a discourse related to the subject of Israeli influence on the United States. It calls for a review of American Mideast policy with a view to reclaiming US independence of action based upon enlightened self-interest and progressive principles.
    Rate Points :3.5
    Binding :Paperback
    Label :Clarity Press, Inc.
    Manufacturer :Clarity Press, Inc.
    ProductGroup :Book
    Studio :Clarity Press, Inc.
    Publisher :Clarity Press, Inc.
    EAN :9780932863515
    Price :$16.95USD
    Lowest Price :$8.95USD
    Customer ReviewsGreat book
    Rating Point :4 Helpful Point :7
    Petras insight into the "jewish" lobby is both insightful and compelling. Aside from sharing the more well known revelations of Israels duplicity in the reasons for the US going into war with Iraq, it also points out the insider dealings of the Israel friendly elite who also happen to be running the worlds richest State, the USA.
    Gladly not a scathing attack on the Jewish faith, nor a tome for anti-semitics - this book is a reminder that all is not well in Middle Eastern politics, particularly with the behind the scenes machinations between Israel and its greatest benefactor, America.
    An excellent synopsis of Israeli influence over the US Federal Government IF you account for the writers leftist views
    Rating Point :4 Helpful Point :6
    1) Overview: Making the Case for Reducing Israeli and Jewish Power in the US Government

    Petras does an excellent step by step job of documenting just how the Neocons in the Pentagon took the United States to war in Iraq. He lays out the strategy and highlights the influence of Jewish Zionists, Mossad agents, and Christian sympathisers in the US government and in Israel and how they work together to move our government in ways that benefit Israel, but- at least in the Iraq invasion- most likely are undertaken at direct cost to Americans lives and wellbeing. He backs up his points with facts that have yet to be countered by other political science researchers. For example Petras states that 35% of Republican and 60% of Democrat campaign donations come from American Zionists! He links US Government payments to Israel as a primary source of this funding. The work appears to be properly researched to US academic standards and is a moderately easy, if distressing, read.

    2) Criticism: The Facts Add Up, But the Writing Method is Somewhat Manipulative

    Petras lays out the facts and then slowly but surely introduces naming conventions and other writing techniques demonstrative of agitation propaganda we became familiar with in the Cold War from Soviet media. Being an old Cold Warrior myself I have a zero tolerance policy for this type of manipulation. Further Petras commentary on Reagan and the Contras/ Central American issues demonstrate a leftist writer with an axe to grind. Still his points on Israel, the Neocons, and the Iraqi invasion are fact based from what I can assess, ergo they must be taken seriously. Effectively, if Dr. Petras had left out the leftist influence in his writing, the work would be a winner no holds barred. As it is it still must be taken seriously by every foreign policy analyst that reads it. Especially pertinent is the apparent move towards converting the American Republic into an empire- which, Petras observes, may be the Knessets plan to expand its power by using controlled US power as a surrogate for Israeli influence globally.

    3) Observations: What we really need is a plan to get the American Government back to being free from foreign influence

    If George Washington had two great warnings in his Farewell Address they were:
    1) Beware of foreign entanglements
    2) Honesty is the Best Policy

    We really need to get a bigger picture idea of the influence of Jewish culture and its Neocon/Zionist execution and impact on America and her citizens. The book is limited in scope to the Iraqi invasion, AIPAC/Mossad spying in the US Government, the impact of torture on Americas image globally, and the clear massive and intentional over representation of Zionist goals within Americas government. The book does not address other issues that may be related to Zionist influences in the US. For example, how will the US Government handle comming conflicts between Zionists and Islamist inside the continental US? Are Israelis responsible for our elected representatives decision to not protect our borders from illegal aliens? (In this case, what else could explain the Bush Administrations decision to not enforce immigration law with 90% of Americans demanding it?)

    Conclusion: This is an important work and a must read for Americans who want their nation to regain its independance and to maintain their role as its owners.
    Brilliant study of the Israel lobby in the USA
    Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :6
    James Petras, Professor of Sociology at Binghamton University, New York, has written a fine study of the pro-Israel lobby in the USA, joining John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walts excellent book, The Israel lobby and U.S. foreign policy. The tide is turning on this matter: 59% of Europeans think that Israel is the biggest threat to Middle East, and world, peace.

    Part 1 looks at the power of the pro-Israel lobby, and how it promoted the war against Iraq. Petras notes that the US-British policy of breaking Iraq into statelets follows the British precedent in setting up the Gulf States at the end of the 19th century and the EU-US scheme of destroying Yugoslavia at the end of the 20th century.

    Part 2 looks at the Israeli record of torture and assassination against the Palestinians, the invasions of Gaza and Lebanon, the threat to Iran, and Israels efforts to polarise Christians against Muslims.

    Part 3 examines the role of so-called terror experts like Harvards Professor Jessica Stern, who claims to explain how violent Islamic nihilism continues to spread. Part 4 shows the importance of the lobby, rather then Big Oil or finance capital, in shaping the USAs imperial policy. The US undercuts the interests of the oil companies, which want peace so that they can maximise their profits, in favour of Israels interests, which wants war to increase its power in the Middle East. Petras also shows how Noam Chomsky underplays the lobbys role.

    Petras concludes, "One will hear from Zionists the relativist argument: Israels crimes are no worse than many countries in the world. However, few countries (except the US) are engaged in colonizing a neighbor, bombing adversaries with impunity (and killing massive numbers of innocent bystanders), storing nuclear warheads with an offensive doctrine, securing the largest proportion of US foreign aid including its most advanced technology, controlling US congressional voting on Mideast issues, shaping the Mideast political agenda for both Presidential candidates, routinely torturing thousands of political prisoners (and sending advisers throughout the world to teach how to do likewise), and practising the totalitarian law of collective punishment for popular resistance."

    We could do with a similar study of the pro-Israel lobby in Britain, of Blair and Browns fanatical Zionism, and of the lobbys fascistic attacks on the University and College Union in Britain.

    The Power of Israel over the United States
    Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :10
    I find it absolutely scary how a little "country" has so much control over our congress and our people here in the U.S.A.Unless we the people wake up and revolt against this foreign powers control here , we as a nation are doomed to follow in the same path of the Roman Empires demise.
    The Truth
    Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :2
    Petras is a courageous writer who analyzes the Israeli control and Zionist control over our country with honesty and precision. The book will offend some people who do not know that the body of this country has an illness which must be corrected or cured before we can hope to honestly adhere to the Constitutional principles we brag about so vehemently as being the principles of the credo we ostensibly live by. If we accept Petras criticism of ourselves we have a good road map to follow in seeking the cure of our own problems. One will understand clearly the problems and the road map when one reads Petras book. This is not an anti semitic book. If it were I would be anti Italian for despising Mussolini for what he did to Italy.

    Ralph Alfieri
    Similar Item
  • The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine
  • In this controversial new book, a prominent Israeli historian at Haifa University revisits the formative period of the State of Israel. Decisively debunking the myth that the Palestinian population left of their own accord during the War of Independe
  • Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid
  • PRESIDENT CARTERS COURAGEOUS ASSESSMENT OF WHAT MUST BE DONE TO BRING PERMANENT PEACE TO ISRAEL WITH DIGNITY AND JUSTICE TO PALESTINEAmazon.com ReviewThe crowning achievement of Jimmy Carters presidency was the Camp David Accords between Isra
  • The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy
  • The Israel Lobby, by John J. Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago and Stephen M. Walt of Harvards John F. Kennedy School of Government, was one of the most controversial articles in recent memory. Originally published in the London Review of Book
  • They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel's Lobby
  • Rulers and Ruled in the US Empire: Bankers, Zionists and Militants
  • This book provides a comprehensive guide to the systemic dimensions of the US empire. Petras elaborates the changes within the US ruling class, as its manufacturing sector declines and gives way to the ascendancy of finance capital, illustrated by it