วันจันทร์ที่ 16 มีนาคม พ.ศ. 2552

Iraq For Sale: The War Profiteers

Iraq for Sale: The War Profiteers

Description


Iraq for Sale: The War Profiteers is the story of what happens to everyday Americans when corporations go to war.

Acclaimed director Robert Greenwald (Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price, Outfoxed, and Uncovered) takes you inside the lives of soldiers, truck drivers, widows and children who have been changed forever as a result of profiteering in the reconstruction of Iraq. Iraq for Sale uncovers the connections between private corporations making a killing in Iraq and the decision makers who allow them to do so.
Rate Points :4.5
Binding :DVD
Label :Brave New Films
Manufacturer :Brave New Films
ProductGroup :DVD
Studio :Brave New Films
Publisher :Brave New Films
UPC :893890001994
EAN :0893890001994
Price :$14.95USD
Lowest Price :$10.71USD
Customer ReviewsEmotion reigns in this ranting film
Rating Point :2 Helpful Point :0
I am in the US Army.
This is not a documentary. It is made up of interspersed interviews with people who fit into four categories: families of civilian contractors who died, civilian contractors who survived an attack, eyewitnesses of wasteful spending by companies with government contracts, and former Soldiers of unknown character complaining about the use of civilian contractors in Iraq. Wrongdoing should be punished. This film never clears up whether it is against wasteful spending or against the use of civilian contractors altogether. The films arguments are too broad and, sometimes, random and confusing. Several times, the statement is made that "this war has been privatized to a greater extent than any other war in history." This is an asinine comment. With a new type of war being fought over the course of almost a decade, now, of course private companies will be employed more than before. Statements like these are devoid of value in the greater debate of how to regulate wasteful spending by these large corporations. Another frustrating element of this film is that the images from Iraq are not related to the story being told at that time. Its confusing for the viewer. Interviews with people who had first-hand knowledge of the wasteful spending were effective, but few, and as a result, the filmmaker spread them throughout the film, which watered down the effectiveness of their accounts. Unfortunate.
As a Soldier, I found the complaints about contractors living in better quarters than tent-bound Soldiers ridiculous. Soldiers, Marines, Sailors, and Airmen have given their lives to their Country and are willing to sleep in muck and grime for the sake of the cause. Civilians, brave and heroic them all, need a softer touch. The men and women of the U.S. Military are happy to sleep wherever the mission takes us. Keep your pity to yourself. Of course Soldiers are going to living in the suck, suffer, bleed, and die thats our calling. We love it! Were here, on the wall, so you dont have to be. Just say thank you and move on.
The emotional outcry against Halliburton as a demonic overlord is very compelling however, not backed by enough evidence to be completely persuasive. The speakers are mostly just making accusations that sound reasonable, but are not substantiated within the film itself. (This only makes the fact that there is a special feature on the DVD aimed at organizing protesters more laughable. Is it possible to organize protesters based solely on unsubstantiated claims, reasonable or not?) Someone is going to make money on the privatization of jobs by the U.S. Government. The American economy is built on the concept of companies doing what they can, within ethical boundaries, to make money. That shouldnt be discouraged. Only wrongful profiteering should be punished. This film does not clearly delineate between the two, so the viewer is never sure which is under attack.
There are two redeeming qualities in the film: First, the opening story of the Blackwater employee, who died in an ambush, was touching. The familys argument that an ambush, by definition a surprise attack, could have been avoided was heart-wrenchingly nave. The second redeeming comment was the argument that more Iraqi civilians should have been hired, thereby getting them off the street and winning a PR battle, was very enlightening. (This approach worked in Germany and Korea.) Too bad the rest of the film is simply an emotional debate and not one backed up by actual evidence, but rather logical assumptions on the part of the individual interviewees. Pass this one up.

Sad!!!
Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :0
We are too lazy, naive, afraid and stupefied to even comprehend what is happening around the globe. If it doesnt affect us directly its not our problem!! Right? Right!! Anyway people get too stressed when they see and or hear about extremely disturbing things, such as this DVDs context -Economical Racketeering By Big Business!!

Quick Summary:

Impartial governments around the globe look the other way while companies run amuck making ungodly profits from Tax-Payers. Did I mention all whom are ironically friends of government(s) and or were once government officials themselves?

The list of neglect (cutting corners over charging) for the almighty dollar are endless atrocities that are absolutely prevalent simply go unchecked.

Worry about that? Not Me Joe FreeWorld we/I cant change anything anyway ...were helpless!!!

Sadly, all of the people/families interviewed in this DVD were uneducated or unaware themselves UNTIL family members ended up dead or they themselves saw BIG BUSINESS up-close and personal.

These factions run along side our governments (some never even bid for the job its simply given to them) - all involved willing to put you in harms way for "PROFITABILITY"!!!

These companies spoke about in this program will never be held accountable for their over spending and or the death-toll to regular Joes ...not until its too late then maybe a few patsys will be thrown in jail.

This is the Zeitgeist of our times ...this is our legacy!!!
Crime pays
Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :0
As people looted in the streets of Iraq following the 2003 United States invasion, U.S. Secretary of War Donald Rumsfeld said, "Freedoms untidy, and free people are free to make mistakes and commit crimes and do bad things."

Perhaps the free-for-all Rumsfeld referenced wasnt Iraq citizens stealing television sets from bombed-out retail stores. As the documentary IRAQ FOR SALE details, those feeling free to commit crimes and do bad things in U.S.-occupied Iraq are Halliburton, Titan, Blackwater and other contractors with friends in high places, namely the halls of the George W. Bush White House.

Privately-contracted interrogators abuse Iraqi citizens without being subject to laws that would call for a court martial were they U.S. military personnel. Kellogg Brown & Root supplies contaminated water to American soldiers. Halliburton charges $45 for a six-pack of soda pop. In IRAQ FOR SALE we see the contractors disregard for anything except profits includes the lives of their own employees, most noteworthy the four Blackwater security personnel who die because the company sends them ill-equipped and under-manned on a dangerous mission.

IRAQ FOR SALE presents a press conference clip where George W. Bush laughs off a reporters question about military contractor corruption. Rather than follow up with Bush, the reporter laughs, too, and lets him off the hook. Of all the accomplices Bush had in his illegal invasion of Iraq, the corporate media are among those with the dirtiest hands.

See IRAQ FOR SALE.
A Must See
Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :0
This is a must see. Our government contracts out the interrogation and torture of Iraqi civilians to private companies which are not subjected to any sort of supervision, so that the U.S. government can wash itself clean of any ethical misconduct.

This movie also addresses the tremendous financial gains that are made by several private companies that are essentially stealing money from taxpayers and care nothing for the health and well being of the militia they are contracted to protect.
fabulous Iraqi facts
Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :0
Iraq for Sale: The War ProfiteersThis film is amazing! I had a slap in the face wake up call. I know that I must work even harder to help stop what is happening in Iraq and stop the hemorrhaging of our military budjet and our American way of life from being funneled to the "WAR PROFITIEERS". Brilliant and concise detail. Our soliders deserve better. Diana Harden...Livermore, Ca.
Similar Item
  • Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price
  • DescriptionEveryone has seen Wal-Marts lavish television commercials, but have you ever wondered why Wal-Mart spends so much money trying to convince you it cares about your family, your community, and even its own employees? What is it hiding? WAL-
  • Who Killed the Electric Car?
  • In 1996, electric cars began to appear on roads all over California. They were quiet and fast, produced no exhaust and ran without gasoline. Ten years later, these futuristic cars were almost entirely gone. What happened? Why should we be haunted by
  • No End in Sight
  • Studio Magnolia Pict Hm Ent Release Date 11/25/2008 Run time 102 minutes Rating NrAmazon.comA staggering portrait of arrogance and incompetence, the documentary No End in Sight avoids the question of why the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003, choosing i
  • Sicko (Special Edition)
  • DescriptionFollowing on the heels of his Palm dOr winning Fahrenheit 9/11 and his Oscar winning film Bowling for Columbine, acclaimed filmmaker Michael Moores new documentary sets out to investigate the American healthcare system. Sticking to his tri
  • Why We Fight
  • DescriptionWhy We Fight is the provocative new documentary from acclaimed filmmaker Eugene Jarecki (The Trials of Henry Kissinger) and winner of the Grand Jury Prize at the 2005 Sundance Film Festival. Named after the series of short films by legend

    วันอาทิตย์ที่ 15 มีนาคม พ.ศ. 2552

    Antoine De La Mothe Cadillac: French Settlements At Detroit And Louisiana (In The Footsteps Of Explorers)

    Antoine De La Mothe Cadillac: French Settlements at Detroit And Louisiana (In the Footsteps of Explorers)

    Product Description


    Ages 9 to 12 years. This book outlines Antoine de la Mothe Cadillacs hunger for power and adventure led him to the New World where he founded Detroit, now one of the oldest cities in North America. Features include maps, his family history, and the legacy he left behind.
    Binding :Library Binding
    Label :Crabtree Publishing Company
    Manufacturer :Crabtree Publishing Company
    ProductGroup :Book
    Studio :Crabtree Publishing Company
    Publisher :Crabtree Publishing Company
    EAN :9780778724292
    Price :$26.60USD
    Lowest Price :$15.97USD

    วันเสาร์ที่ 14 มีนาคม พ.ศ. 2552

    วันศุกร์ที่ 13 มีนาคม พ.ศ. 2552

    Zigzag Journeys In Acadia And New France: The Historic Fields Of The Early French Settlements Of America

    Zigzag Journeys in Acadia and New France: The Historic Fields of the Early French Settlements of America

    Product Description


    1885. Zigzag Journeys in Acadia and New France A Summers Journey of the Zigzag Club Through the Historic Fields of the Early French Settlements of America. From the Preface: The aim of the Zigzag books is to awaken an interest in the history, geography, and political condition of each country of which they treat, by means of a narrative of supposed travel, that makes a visit to interesting places the purpose of the young travelers. It is hoped that the light narrative, with its pictures, legends, and interpolated stories, may awaken an interest in the young mind that will lead to the reading of more solid books on the same countries and topics, as maturer years follow the story-loving period of youth. Contents: A Zigzag Journey in New France (Canada) A Proposed Journey in Search of the Stories and Legends of New France The Zigzag Clubs Songs and Stories Cardinal Richelieus Dream of New France Charlie Nobles Concert For St. John Annapolis (Port Royal) To the Land of Evangeline Halifax and Louisburg Tales of the St. Lawrence Quebec Montreal and Toronto. See other titles by this author available from Kessinger Publishing.
    Binding :Paperback
    Label :Kessinger Publishing, LLC
    Manufacturer :Kessinger Publishing, LLC
    ProductGroup :Book
    Studio :Kessinger Publishing, LLC
    Publisher :Kessinger Publishing, LLC
    EAN :9781417903320
    Price :$30.95USD
    Lowest Price :$20.42USD

    วันพฤหัสบดีที่ 12 มีนาคม พ.ศ. 2552

    Color Of Olives, The

    Color of Olives, The

    Product Description


    From Mexican director Carolina Rivas and cinematographer Daoud Sarhandi comes this elegant and visually breathtaking new film about the Palestinian experience. The Amer family lives surrounded by the infamous West Bank Wall, where their daily lives are dominated by electrified fences, locked gates and a constant swarm of armed soldiers. This unique and intimate documentary shares their private world, allowing a glimpse of the constant struggles and the small, endearing details that sustain them. The Color of Olives is an artistic and beautifully affecting reflection on the effects of racial segregation, the meaning of borders and the absurdity of war.
    Rate Points :5.0
    Binding :DVD
    Label :afd
    Manufacturer :afd
    ProductGroup :DVD
    Studio :afd
    Publisher :afd
    UPC :643519118998
    EAN :0643519118998
    Price :$24.99USD
    Lowest Price :$19.98USD
    Customer Reviews
    Similar Item
  • Encounter Point
  • Just when the world is losing hope about the possibility of resolving the Palestinian-Israeli conflict comes ENCOUNTER POINT. Created by a Palestinian, Israeli, North and South American team, ENCOUNTER POINT moves beyond sensational and dogmatic imag
  • Until When...
  • Paradise Now
  • Amazon.comTwo men, best friends from childhood, are summoned to fulfill their agreement to be suicide bombers for the Palestinian cause. Khaled and Said (Ali Suliman and Kais Nashef, both making striking film debuts) believe fervently in their cause,
  • Private
  • DescriptionWinner!! - Best Film, 2004 Locarno Film Festival Winner!! - Best Actor, Mohammad Bakri, 2004 Locarno Film Festival Winner!! - Fipresci Jury Award, 2005 Intl. Federation of Film Critics Mohammad (Mohammad Bakri), his wife (Areen Omari) and
  • Promises
  • Amazon.comPromises presents a powerful portrait of seven Palestinian and Israeli children who live in and around Jerusalem. As filmmaker B.Z. Goldberg, who was raised in Israel, notes, "They live no more than 20 minutes from each other, but they are

    วันพุธที่ 11 มีนาคม พ.ศ. 2552

    Private

    Private

    Description


    Winner!! - Best Film, 2004 Locarno Film Festival
    Winner!! - Best Actor, Mohammad Bakri, 2004 Locarno Film Festival
    Winner!! - Fipresci Jury Award, 2005 Intl. Federation of Film Critics

    Mohammad (Mohammad Bakri), his wife (Areen Omari) and their five children live in a large, isolated house located mid-way between a Palestinian village and an Israeli settlement. Viewed as a strategic lookout point, the house is forcefully taken over by Israeli soldiers, who confine Mohammad and his family to a few downstairs rooms in daytime and a single room at night. Against his wifes wishes, Mohammad decides to keep the family together in the house until the soldiers move on, creating division among his kin and a precarious relationship with the soldiers. Italys pick for the 2005 Foreign Film Oscar competition (before being disqualified by the Academy because the primary languages were not Itlaian), Saverio Costanzos first feature is a powerful and haunting psychological thriller.

    DVD EXTRAS:
  • Directors Bio
  • Production Information
  • Trailers

  • Rate Points :3.5
    Binding :DVD
    Label :Typecast Releasing
    Manufacturer :Typecast Releasing
    ProductGroup :DVD
    Studio :Typecast Releasing
    Publisher :Typecast Releasing
    UPC :643519120595
    EAN :0643519117397
    Price :$29.99USD
    Lowest Price :$14.00USD
    Customer ReviewsBrutal, honest, sincere
    Rating Point :5 Helpful Point :14
    Easily the best film I have seen on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Private expresses the intense antagonisms of the political conflict through an extremely particular interaction between a Palestinian family and an Israeli military unit. Though the political and the personal are woven into each and every struggle of the film, characters are accorded their humanity in personal terms, avoiding the common descent into generalization of many films on this conflict.

    The greatest strength of this film is that, though the conflict is central to every piece of the story, it is expressed primarily in its pervasive influence on the individual: the brutality of power, racism, the struggle to maintain purpose amidst uncertainty and fear. In doing this, the film refuses to draw clear lines. There are few heroes, and their moments of redemeption are not grand but small, reluctant, even accidental.

    This film has not received the publicity of other recent films and documentaries on the conflict. I fear this is partly because it does not provide that warm, fuzzy feeling U.S. audiences seek. But, probably more important, the film is geared for an audience that is already familiar with the conflict. There is little explanation of who the characters are or the circumstances in which the plot occurs. These are immediately obvious to those familiar with the conflict, but may lead to confusion on the part of many viewers.

    Still, if it is a window into the intimate struggles of the conflict you seek, I can not recommend any better film. While one can not help but draw broader implications, it is very clear that the characters are not meant to be merely lowest-common-denominator representatives of their respective societies. Each tells their own tale, and the parts do not add up to the whole story of the conflict, but the pieces that are presented are thoroughly and sincerely told.
    Intense and Difficult
    Rating Point :3 Helpful Point :4
    Not many American audiences will be familiar with Saverio Costanzos Golden Leopard Award winning Private. This is because Hollywood would not dare to approach the Palestine-Israeli issue from a decidely Arab prospective. The second reason is that this is intense filmmaking that challenges our ideas on the Middle Eastern situation.

    Mohammad(Mohammad Bakri) is a middle aged father of five living with his wife Samiah (Areen Omari) in a lage house midway between a Palestinian village and an Israeli settlement. Sice the home can be viewed as a strategic lookout point it is forceably occupied by Israeli soldiers led by Commander Ofer (Lior Miller). The family is given the choice either to leave the house or to occupy a few downstairs rooms in the daytime and be locked in the living room at night. The family, under pain of punishment, is told that they must not venture into the upstairs bedrooms where the soldiers are staying.

    What follows the occupation can be seen as a metaphor for the entire Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Mohammad is faced with the choice to leave and thus give up his principles to to maintain his nonviolent protest come what may. His oldest daughter,Mariam (Hend Ayoub), wants to stay and fight but at great danger to herself tries desperately to humanize her captors. The familys oldeat son, Jamal (Marco Alsaving)chooses a far more violent approach. He sides with Palestinian freedom fighters and imagines himself to be one. What we have here is more than the story of a people. Rather it is the very real story of a family falling apart in the face of adversity.

    The film was shot in DV by Luigi Martinucci and the picture has a murky verite feel especially in the nighttime scenes. The viewer becomes almost a voyeur to the action and as the movie moves along we feel claustrophobic and trapped like the family.

    This is a difficult film to watch because of the subject matter but it should be seen by a wider audience than it has. The all region disc by Typecast features none of the special features that are available on the Region 2 disc that has been widely reviewed in the media. The Dolby 2.0 sountrack is servicable and the disc contains a trailer and simple production notes.

    Well worth the effort if you can find it.
    Liberal Sentimental Mush
    Rating Point :1 Helpful Point :7
    What would one say about a film portraying a concentration camp during the holocaust where the key questions are those posed to the inmates how are they going to resist, will they collaborate, and so on. What if the SS guard in the watchtower during the day is portrayed as "human", and playing around with his mates after work? And a film where no hard questions are put to the _oppressor_. Well, Costanzos film is just that in the Palestinian context. It is film that delves primarily on trite clichs, sentimental mush about the victims, and also about portraying the soldiers as "human" and also victims.

    The film was shot in Italy with a cast of Palestinian and Israeli actors. All the Israelis are active members of the Israeli armed forces, and the lead Israeli character is a member of the infamous Golani brigade -- known for its violent actions in the occupied territories. During the initial stages of the filming, a competition arose between the Palestinians and Israelis to outbid one another in portraying their "humanity". Of course, following this formula it is not possible to depict the Palestinian condition, and the portrayal of Israeli actions is inherently biased -- the soldiers are on their best behavior, and dont show the brutal face seen by most Palestinians.

    The film finds the silliest means imaginable to show the Israeli "human face". The teenage daughter seeks to steal a weapon and possibly use it against the soldiers, but is thwarted at the last moment by an intervention of another soldier. She manages to hide in a closet and gets a glimpse of her tormentors. After this close brush, she repeatedly hides in the closet to get further insights into the soldiers lives, and determines that there is a "human side" to them -- humanity viewed through a peephole. From this insight, she also changes her attitude towards the occupier and adopts her fathers steadfast resistance. Costanzo uses the glimpses of "humanity" seen covertly through the closets doors to demonstrate that the Israeli soldiers are "human". This framework is patently absurd because the issue is not the warm relationship among the soldiers or the fact that they get excited about football the issue is their behavior towards the Palestinians and here there isnt much "humane" behavior in evidence. Similarly, the many actual cases of dispossession are not marked by "humane" behavior in reality, brutality is the norm. The transformation of the daughters assessment of the soldiers doesnt come about because of a change in their behavior towards the family, but only because she finds that between each other the soldiers are actually quite ordinary! Nothing in the reaction of the Israeli soldiers could explain the change of the two teenage children from willingness to countenance violence to one where they decide to pursue a non-violent steadfast resistance.

    One must also wonder why the director seeks to "humanize" the oppressor. It would be difficult to imagine the need to "humanize", say, the armed settlers who make Palestinian lives miserable. Those perpetrating brutal and sordid acts dont deserve to be "humanized" -- what is important is to highlight the oppression, not the nature of the oppressors.
    Neither does the father have much to show for his steadfastness. His small acts of resistance bear no fruit, nor do they change the Israeli behavior. On the contrary, for the flimsiest of reasons the Israeli commander threatens to execute him in front of his family -- oh yes, one of the soldiers briefly raises an objection that is quickly dismissed by the officer. There is no reason in this film to think that the Israelis have changed their attitude, let alone decide to exit the house and observe common decency.

    Some days after the threatened execution, Bakri and the officer sit at the kitchen table, and maybe this was meant to show a glimpse of mutual appreciation. The officer asks Bakri why he stays in his house -- which yields the profound reply "because this is my house"! The fact that the Israeli soldier asks the question at all is already problematic because in reality it is a common question asked by soldiers of those whom they seek to dispossess. The dialogue with this soldier isnt one where the oppressor tries to understand the oppressed. Bakris means of resistance hasnt penetrated through to the human core of his tormentors.

    The portrayal of the steadfast resistance, or sumud, is also flawed. In one scene, the youngest daughter desperately seeks to go to the bathroom and acceding to her plight would mean her father banging on the door, demanding that the soldiers allow his daughter to go to the bathroom. Instead of banging on the door and eliciting a likely confrontation, Bakri urges his daughter to resist her need to go! NB: steadfast non-violent resistance doesnt mean that one should improve ones bladder control. Non-violent resistance is more than just clinging on to a patch of land in Gandhis approach, it entails confronting the oppressor. In this film, non-violent resistance is represented as clinging on to the house, and the father seeks to keep confrontations with the soldiers to a minimum. Again, this is absurd.

    Missing the key point

    The film dwells on the intra-family tensions in dealing with the occupation of their house and focuses on the friction arising from the characters differing views on how to confront the soldiers. The films focus is how to resist, with a strong suggestion that the resistance should be non-violent. However, the director fails to ask the key question and never really explains _why_ the soldiers invaded this house or why there are any tensions between Israelis and Palestinians. The means whereby Palestinians resist is an issue that has to be debated in their society and by the people affected by the occupation and dispossession. Whatever the outcome of that debate, i.e., a non-violent or violent way to resist, should not affect an outsiders solidarity with a people who have been subjected to mass injustice. Now, if one were to query why this dreadful situation persists, then this would raise questions for the oppressor and those outside the region concerned with the injustices being perpetrated. Unfortunately, the film stresses the issues centering on the Palestinian society, and not those that impinge on Israelis or outsiders. In essence, the film fails on many levels.

    Illegitimate questions

    Many soldiers and settlers in the occupied territories are making the life of the Palestinians miserable, and the questions that come to mind are those one would want to pose to the soldiers -- the oppressors. How do they justify the manifest barbarity against the Palestinians? When they invade houses, why do they opt for this drawn out torture and misery? Why do they feel that they are justified in stealing Palestinian homes? And why does the Israeli government connive with the settlers? These are the key questions. Ultimately, these questions need to be addressed by anyone concerned with confronting injustice.


    It would have been rather tactless for anyone to have asked the Palestinian family portrayed in the film how they planned to resist the soldiers attempt to steal their home. If they chose to resist by violent means this would have given the Israelis the ultimate pretext to dispossess and banish the family. If they chose steadfast resistance, they would have to endure the brutality, humiliation and intimidation. It is facile for liberals to pontificate about non-violent resistance, but ultimately any option has stark consequences. It is also a sign of illegitimate solidarity for one to put the onus on the Palestinians and the way they confront the armed settlers or the soldiers. The key moral questions need to be posed to the oppressors, not the oppressed. Alas, this film deals exclusively with questions posed to the oppressed, and this comes after decades of oppression and dispossession.
    Compelling
    Rating Point :4 Helpful Point :1
    This film shows an unusual "other side" of the Middle East problem. The media is kind of controlled and we never get to see the palestinian casualties and drama. Some unaware people even think they dont have hearts,families, children and pain. The film also suggests that when you live a desperate life and have no choices sometimes you look for desperate actions.
    Increasing Understanding
    Rating Point :4 Helpful Point :1
    "Private"

    Increasing Understanding

    Amos Lassen

    Understanding the Israeli/Palestinian conflict is not easy even for those of us that once lived there. "Private", an Italian film, looks at the conflict and tries to make it more understandable. "Private" shows the horror and pain that a Palestinian family goes through. Under occupation one loses his freedom.
    The plot is simple--a Palestinian family with five children lives near Israeli settlements. The wife, Samia, wants to leave as does one of her teen sons. However, Mohammed, the father/husband, not only does not want to go and is adamant about staying. Two of the children want to fight but Mohammed favors passive aggression as a non-violent witness. Suddenly Israeli soldiers burst into their home and take over the second floor. The family is locked in the living room at night allowing them almost no mobility. We see how the occupation affects the children and their parents marriage. It is through daughter, Miriam that we see the Israeli forces and how they behave. The eldest son, Jamal, is so angered that he sets a trap with a grenade. Realizing that chaos and death are not far away, the family calls to Allah for help.
    What makes this film so special is that it shows the weaknesses and dignities of both sides without favoritism for either. Mohammeds family is one of privilege that has been reduced by the occupation. I actually felt badly when the Israelis invade the home. The film is rich with excellent acting by the cast which is both Jewish and Muslim. Mohammed Bakri is absolutely brilliant as the father who subtlely conveys a commanding presence as well as man who has been humiliated in front of his family and does not know how to recover his authority. He struggles to keep his family from harm while at the same time attempting to maintain a sense of dignity in the face of insult.
    We get a peek at the reality of the Israeli occupation and we see what we probably did not know before. Political realities are powerful and this film is powerful. It will not "entertain" you in the way other films do but it will certainly give you something to think about,

    Similar Item
  • Until When...
  • Color of Olives, The
  • From Mexican director Carolina Rivas and cinematographer Daoud Sarhandi comes this elegant and visually breathtaking new film about the Palestinian experience. The Amer family lives surrounded by the infamous West Bank Wall, where their daily lives a
  • Gaza Strip
  • DescriptionIn January of 2001, American director James Longley traveled to the Gaza Strip. His plan was to stay for two weeks to collect preliminary material for a documentary film on the Palestinian Intifada. It was during his stay that Ariel Shar
  • Encounter Point
  • Just when the world is losing hope about the possibility of resolving the Palestinian-Israeli conflict comes ENCOUNTER POINT. Created by a Palestinian, Israeli, North and South American team, ENCOUNTER POINT moves beyond sensational and dogmatic imag
  • Paradise Now
  • Amazon.comTwo men, best friends from childhood, are summoned to fulfill their agreement to be suicide bombers for the Palestinian cause. Khaled and Said (Ali Suliman and Kais Nashef, both making striking film debuts) believe fervently in their cause,